Sofia Da Cruz Mendonca vs Laura Badia Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Over the past year, the performance overview indicates that Badia has secured victories in 40% of their matches with a win/loss record of 8/12. Meanwhile, Mendonca has emerged successful in 43.75% of matches played, tallying 14 wins against 18 losses. These records provide a baseline for head-to-head predictions.

Analyzing second serve performance from the last six months, Badia has secured 38.21% of points, while Mendonca has managed to win 37.85%. These metrics show a notable correlation with match outcomes. Furthermore, in return games, Badia has won 55.47% of points against opponents' second serves, whereas Mendonca has achieved a higher 57.84%.

On the subject of pressure situations, Badia has saved 41.27% of breakpoints in recent form compared to Mendonca's 46.75%. Mendonca's ability to withstand pressure situations can be crucial for in-game predictions. Breakpoint conversion rates also play a pivotal role, with Badia converting 40.91% and Mendonca converting 44.35% of opportunities.

Their track record on different surfaces shows Badia's highest win percentage on Clay at 38%, matching their lowest surface performance also on Clay. Mendonca, however, excels on indoor hard courts with a 75% win rate but struggles on outdoor hard courts with just 26% wins.

Looking at recent competition, Badia has typically played Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K-level matches, winning 53.85%, while Mendonca's record in similar tournaments stands at 54.55%. The level of competition often influences predictions based on the event hierarchy.

In historical direct encounters, Badia and Mendonca have met twice, splitting wins evenly. Their matches have averaged a duration of 2:19:0. Each has won one of the two deciding sets they have played, and Badia has triumphed in their only tiebreak against Mendonca.

When considering opponent quality, Badia has faced higher-ranked players with an average rank of 293.2 compared to Mendonca's 397.03. In terms of deciding set performance against all opponents, Badia has secured victories in 50% of deciding sets in the past year, whereas Mendonca has won 38%.

With the accumulated data, Mendonca slightly edges out Badia in several key areas, including breakpoint conversion and return performance. Consequently, this data-driven analysis suggests that Mendonca may have a slight advantage in their upcoming match.